Ibrahim Tunde Yusuf, Aondoaseer Andy Abur, Terseer Ako, Solomon Olakunle Bilewu


Assessment of the qualitative performance of a roundabout in relation to factors, such as delays, queues, level of service (LOS), accident, operation cost and environmental issues is necessary for its successful operation. This study, therefore, aims at analysing the qualitative performance of roundabouts in an urban area, Nigeria with the Fate roundabout in Ilorin metropolitan city as study case. The movement of the vehicles was observed and traffic counts carried out manually, at 15 minutes intervals for 12 hours (6:30am-6:30pm) daily for seven (7) days, from Monday, June 15th to Sunday, June 21st, 2015. Results show that, the five (5) working days (Monday-Friday), have high traffic volume counts and were selected for the analysis. Peak hour factors (PHF) were used to convert the demand volumes to flow rates. The qualitative performance analyses were carried out based on the 12-step approach for the performance analysis of a roundabout as outlined by the Highway Capacity Manual. Approach and entry capacities were determined as mathematical functions of critical headway, and follow-up headway were then estimated using the analytical approach. The degree of saturation, delay, and queue length used in estimating the performance of a roundabout were also determined. The relation between the roundabout performance measure and capacity, expressed in terms of degree of saturation shows that the performance of the Fate roundabout ranged between LOS A – E. An increase in the entry lane width at Basin road approach was recommended to ensure continuous and smooth flow at the roundabout.


Roundabout, level of service, entry capacities, peak hour factor, volume rates

Full Text:



Akçelic, R. (2007). A Review of Gap - Acceptance Models. In Paper Presented at the 29th Conference of Australian Institute of Transport Research (CAITR), Adelaide, Australia.

Akçelic, R. (2011). An Assessment of the Highway Capacity Manual 2010: Roundabout Capacity Model. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Roundabouts, Carmel. Pp 46 -52

Churchill, T., Stipdonk, S. and Bijleveled, F. (2010). Effect of Roundabout on Road Casualty. SWOV, Leidschendam, Netherlands.

CIA (2013) The World Fact Book (http:/www.odci.gov/cia/publications/factbook/index.html)

DeAmico, A. (2012). Roundabout Capacity and Comparative Software Analysis. University of Wisconsin, Madison, USA.

Douglas, R. K., Patton, P.E., Harris, R. and Chantilly, V. A. (2005). Estimating Roundabout Performance using Delay and Conflict Opportunity Crash Prediction. National Roundabout Conference Draft 2005.

Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) (2010). Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington D.C. USA

Mark, L. (2003). Roundabout Planning and Design for Efficiency and Safety- Case Study: Ontario, Canada.

Nokia Networks, Technology and Mapping (2015). Nokia Corporation, Finland.

Rodegerdts, L. A.., Justin, B., Christopher, T., Knuden, J. and Mayers, E. (2010). National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP) Report 672- Roundabouts: An Informational Guide (2nd Edition). Transportation Research Board, Washington D. C., USA. www.TRB.org.

Rodegerdts, L. A., Pete, M., Jenior, Z., Bugg, H. and Brian L. R. (2014). National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP) Report 772: Evaluating the Performance of Corridors with Roundabouts”, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., USA. www.TRB.org.

Sargeant, S. and Christie, J. (2002). Performance Evaluation of Modern Roundabouts on South Golden Road. In Canadian Transportation Research Forum 37th Annual Conference, St. John’s, Newfoundland.

Serhan, T. S., PelinÇalişkanelli, M. A. and Seçil, B. U. (2013). An Investigation of Heavy Vehicle Effect on Traffic Circles, TeknikDergi 24 (3). Pp 12- 21

DOI: https://doi.org/10.11113/mjce.v30n2.480


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright © 2018 Penerbit UTM Press, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia.
Disclaimer : This website has been updated to the best of our knowledge to be accurate. However, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia shall not be liable for any loss or damage caused by the usage of any information obtained from this web site.
Best viewed: Mozilla Firefox 4.0 & Google Chrome at 1024 × 768 resolution.